Daniel Lopez Cardoza v. State
This text of Daniel Lopez Cardoza v. State (Daniel Lopez Cardoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
CORRECTED JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 9, 2015
NO. 03-13-00269-CR
Daniel Lopez Cardoza, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED; MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the trial court’s
judgments requiring reversal. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of
conviction for Count III. However, there was error in the judgment of conviction for Count II
that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of conviction
for Count II to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “22.021(a)(1)(B)(iii), (2)(B) Penal Code.”
The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs,
no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Lopez Cardoza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-lopez-cardoza-v-state-texapp-2015.