Daniel Lee Jackson v. William Dobbs

Fifth Circuit

Daniel Lee Jackson v. William Dobbs

442 F.2d 928, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11035

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 30, 1971

Docket30266

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 442 F.2d 928 (Daniel Lee Jackson v. William Dobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Lee Jackson v. William Dobbs, 442 F.2d 928, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11035 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

In this case against certain city officials of Covington, Georgia, appellants attack an ordinance of the city regulating parades, demonstrations, assemblies and picketing, under which they were arrested, and sought a temporary and preliminary injunction. After a hearing the Court denied appellants’ motion for a temporary and preliminary injunction; the record before us does not indicate that the court dismissed the complaint.

We affirm the judgment of the district court denying injunctive relief and remand the case with direction to dismiss the complaint. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S.Ct. 758, 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S. Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.Ed.2d 781 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U. S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792 (1971). See also: Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1971); Gornto v. Thomas, et al., 439 F.2d- (5th Cir. 1971).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this case against certain city officials of Covington, Georgia, appellants attack an ordinance of the city regulating parades, demonstrations, assemblies and picketing, under which they were arrested, and sought a temporary and preliminary injunction. After a hearing the Court denied appellants’ motion for a temporary and preliminary injunction; the record before us does not indicate that the court dismissed the complaint.

We affirm the judgment of the district court denying injunctive relief and remand the case with direction to dismiss the complaint. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S.Ct. 758, 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S. Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.Ed.2d 781 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U. S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792 (1971). See also: Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1971); Gornto v. Thomas, et al., 439 F.2d- (5th Cir. 1971).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 F.2d 928, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-lee-jackson-v-william-dobbs-ca5-1971.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack