Daniel Lee Draper v. State of Tennessee - Concurring
This text of Daniel Lee Draper v. State of Tennessee - Concurring (Daniel Lee Draper v. State of Tennessee - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 23, 2010
DANIEL LEE DRAPER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sullivan County No. S45,106 R. Jerry Beck, Judge
No. E2009-00952-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 21, 2010
JOSEPH M. TIPTON, P.J., concurring.
I concur with the results reached in the majority opinion. I respectfully disagree with the majority view of the timeliness of the petition for a writ of error coram nobis. I do not believe the Petitioner’s mistaken filing of a second post-conviction petition, not provided by law, tolled the time within which a coram nobis petition was to be filed. The Petitioner’s ignorance of the proper action to take does not warrant a due process tolling of the statute of limitations in this case.
____________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, PRESIDING JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Lee Draper v. State of Tennessee - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-lee-draper-v-state-of-tennessee-concurring-tenncrimapp-2010.