Daniel Jaiyong An v. Archblock, Inc.

CourtCourt of Chancery of Delaware
DecidedApril 4, 2025
Docket2024-0102-LWW
StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Jaiyong An v. Archblock, Inc. (Daniel Jaiyong An v. Archblock, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Jaiyong An v. Archblock, Inc., (Del. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DANIEL JAIYONG AN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0102-LWW ) ARCHBLOCK, INC., ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATION ON USE OF GENERATIVE AI

WHEREAS, the petitioner filed a motion to compel discovery (Dkt. 25; the

“Motion”) that cites false legal authority and/or miscites legal authority;

WHEREAS, on April 4, 2025, this court issued a letter opinion explaining that

the Motion was denied because the petitioner put forward false citations, presumably

due to his use of generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) in preparing the Motion;

WHEREAS, for purposes of this Order, GenAI means models or tools that

generate new content, including text, based upon machine learning from existing

data. GenAI includes, but is not limited to, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Microsoft

Copilot, Meta AI, and Thomson Reuters CoCounsel.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2025, that:

1. The Motion is denied. 2. Any future court filings in this case by the petitioner that are prepared

using GenAI must be accompanied by a certification, with a sworn

statement by the petitioner, that:

a. Confirms GenAI was used to prepare the court filing;

b. Identifies the GenAI tool, model, or platform used;

c. Identifies the specific pages, paragraphs, and/or sections of the court filing that were created using GenAI; and

d. Confirms that any text in the court filing prepared using GenAI has undergone a human review for accuracy and completeness. This includes confirming that any citation to legal authority is accurate and that the authority stands for the cited proposition.

3. Failure to abide by this Order may lead to the issuance of sanctions.

/s/ Lori W. Will Vice Chancellor Will

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel Jaiyong An v. Archblock, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-jaiyong-an-v-archblock-inc-delch-2025.