Daniel J. Beck v. City of Niagara Falls
This text of Daniel J. Beck v. City of Niagara Falls (Daniel J. Beck v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 66 SSM 8 Daniel J. Beck et al., Appellants, v. City of Niagara Falls, et al., Defendants, Patriot Field Services, Inc., Respondent.
Submitted by Carey C. Beyer, for appellants. Submitted by David M. Katz, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. In response to the prima facie showing by defendant Patriot Field Services, Inc. that it was entitled to summary judgment, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of material fact. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas, Cannataro and Troutman concur.
Decided June 16, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel J. Beck v. City of Niagara Falls, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-j-beck-v-city-of-niagara-falls-ny-2022.