Daniel J. And Lorraine A. Gurta v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

848 F.2d 190, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5982, 1988 WL 41999
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 1988
Docket87-1977
StatusUnpublished

This text of 848 F.2d 190 (Daniel J. And Lorraine A. Gurta v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel J. And Lorraine A. Gurta v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 848 F.2d 190, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5982, 1988 WL 41999 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

848 F.2d 190

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Daniel J. and Lorraine A. GURTA, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-1977.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 5, 1988.

Before LIVELY, MERRITT and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellant's response to this Court's October 23, 1987, order directing him to Show Cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and upon consideration of appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has responded to the show cause order and the motion to dismiss.

A review of the record indicates that appellant's September 28, 1987, notice of appeal from the order of the Tax Court entered April 15, 1987, was filed 76 days late.

The failure of an appellant to timely filed a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. A notice of appeal from a Tax Court decision must be filed within 90 days after the decision is entered. See 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7483; Robert Louis Stevenson Apartments, Inc. v. Commissioner, 337 F.2d 681 (8th Cir.1964). Fed.R.App.P. 13. The filing of a timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite, and the Tax Court cannot grant an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal absent the narrow exception for fraud upon the court. See Feistman v. Commissioner, 587 F.2d 941 (9th Cir.1978). Fed.R.App.P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction be granted and the appeal be and hereby is dismissed. Rule 8, Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 F.2d 190, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5982, 1988 WL 41999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-j-and-lorraine-a-gurta-v-commissioner-of-in-ca6-1988.