Daniel Howe v. Florida Department of Corrections
This text of Daniel Howe v. Florida Department of Corrections (Daniel Howe v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-4345 _____________________________
DANIEL HOWE,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Belated Appeal–Original Jurisdiction.
November 9, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition seeking belated appeal is denied. See Powell v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
WETHERELL, MAKAR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Daniel Howe, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Howe v. Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-howe-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2018.