Daniel Hernandez v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-99-00298-CR Daniel Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 0983165, HONORABLE TOM BLACKWELL, JUDGE PRESIDING

A jury found appellant Daniel Hernandez guilty of robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.02 (West 1994). The district court assessed punishment, enhanced by previous felony convictions, at imprisonment for forty years.

By two points of error, appellant contends his due process and due course of law rights were violated by personal attacks on defense counsel by the prosecutor during jury argument. When appellant first objected, the court admonished the jury to "take the evidence from the witness stand." Appellant's second objection was sustained and he asked for no further relief.

"[A] defendant's failure to object . . . or . . . failure to pursue to an adverse ruling his objection to a jury argument forfeits his right to complain about the argument on appeal." Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). In Cockrell, the court expressly overruled Romo v. State, 631 S.W.2d 504, 505 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982), on which appellant relies to excuse his failure to obtain an adverse ruling. Under Cockrell, no error is presented.

The points of error are overruled and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: April 13, 2000

Do Not Publish