Daniel Gruenfelder v. Kandi Torres, Doroteo Fonseca, and Rafael Menchaca
This text of Daniel Gruenfelder v. Kandi Torres, Doroteo Fonseca, and Rafael Menchaca (Daniel Gruenfelder v. Kandi Torres, Doroteo Fonseca, and Rafael Menchaca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13-17-00441-CV
Daniel Gruenfelder v. Kandi Torres, Doroteo Fonseca, and Rafael Menchaca
On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas Trial Cause No. B-16-1556-CV-C
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged
against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
August 16, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Gruenfelder v. Kandi Torres, Doroteo Fonseca, and Rafael Menchaca, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-gruenfelder-v-kandi-torres-doroteo-fonseca-and-rafael-menchaca-texapp-2018.