Daniel Garza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Daniel Garza v. State

DecidedDecember 8, 2005

Docket13-05-00595-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Garza v. State (Daniel Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-05-594-CR

13-05-595-CR

13-05-596-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

DANIEL GARZA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, DANIEL GARZA, attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. The sentences in these causes were imposed on August 26, 1999. The notices of appeal were due to be filed on September 27, 1999, but were not filed until November 12, 2005. Said notices of appeal are untimely filed.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and motions requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 8th day of December, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBERS 13-05-594-CR

13-05-595-CR

13-05-596-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

DANIEL GARZA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, DANIEL GARZA, attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. The sentences in these causes were imposed on August 26, 1999. The notices of appeal were due to be filed on September 27, 1999, but were not filed until November 12, 2005. Said notices of appeal are untimely filed.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and motions requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 8th day of December, 2005.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Daniel Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-garza-v-state-texapp-2005.