Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 408
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 6, 1961
DocketNo. 65410; protests 138773-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 408 (Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 408 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) As to all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to January 1, 1948, at 12% percent ad valorem under paragraph 210, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T.D. 49753), and (b) as to all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after January 1, 1948, and prior to September 10, 1955, at 20 cents per dozen articles, but not less than 7% percent nor more than 25 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 210, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-f-young-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1961.