Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife

Fifth Circuit

Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife

345 F.2d 178, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5584

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 13, 1965·No. 21742_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The liability of Mr. and Mrs. Peters under the real estate purchase contract in issue was limited, by their choice, to forfeiture of the binder. The bankruptcy court had summary jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of the proceeding which gave rise to this appeal. The judgment of the District Court was premised on these conclusions, and in our view is free from error. It follows that the judgment is affirmed on the appeal and cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The liability of Mr. and Mrs. Peters under the real estate purchase contract in issue was limited, by their choice, to forfeiture of the binder. The bankruptcy court had summary jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of the proceeding which gave rise to this appeal. The judgment of the District Court was premised on these conclusions, and in our view is free from error. It follows that the judgment is affirmed on the appeal and cross-appeal.

Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife, 345 F.2d 178, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5584 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

345 F.2d 178 (Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.