Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife

345 F.2d 178, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5584
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1965
Docket21742_1
StatusPublished

This text of 345 F.2d 178 (Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel F. Bushey and Alma M. Bushey, His Wife v. Wilfred C. Peters and Constance E. Peters, Husband and Wife, 345 F.2d 178, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5584 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The liability of Mr. and Mrs. Peters under the real estate purchase contract in issue was limited, by their choice, to forfeiture of the binder. The bankruptcy court had summary jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of the proceeding which gave rise to this appeal. The judgment of the District Court was premised on these conclusions, and in our view is free from error. It follows that the judgment is affirmed on the appeal and cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 F.2d 178, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-f-bushey-and-alma-m-bushey-his-wife-v-wilfred-c-peters-and-ca5-1965.