Daniel Eugene Mayfield v. Cathy Lynn Mayfield
This text of Daniel Eugene Mayfield v. Cathy Lynn Mayfield (Daniel Eugene Mayfield v. Cathy Lynn Mayfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
________________________________________________________
DANIEL EUGENE MAYFIELD, Appellant,
CATHY LYNN MAYFIELD, Appellee.
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, DANIEL EUGENE MAYFIELD, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 20th District Court of Milam County, Texas, in cause number 30574. After the record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 3rd day of August, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Eugene Mayfield v. Cathy Lynn Mayfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-eugene-mayfield-v-cathy-lynn-mayfield-texapp-2006.