Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/DANIEL EDWARD PANARO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

DANIEL EDWARD PANARO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 2021·No. 21-1419·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL EDWARD PANARO, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D21-1419

[August 15, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 15-000870-CF-AXMX and 15-001008-CF-AXMX.

Daniel Edward Panaro, Chipley, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DANIEL EDWARD PANARO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

DANIEL EDWARD PANARO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DANIEL EDWARD PANARO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.