Daniel Edward Callahan v. Veronica Ann Marota
This text of Daniel Edward Callahan v. Veronica Ann Marota (Daniel Edward Callahan v. Veronica Ann Marota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 27, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161890 (75)(80)(81)(83)(85)(86) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh DANIEL EDWARD CALLAHAN, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 161890 COA: 349454 Ottawa CC: 18-005555-NZ VERONICA ANN MAROTA, Defendant-Appellee, and VINCENT FRED MAROTA, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 2, 2021 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G). The motion requesting court file documentation, motion for acceptance regarding evidence for hearing, motion for an emergency injunction, and the motion for stay are DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 27, 2021 b0419 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Edward Callahan v. Veronica Ann Marota, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-edward-callahan-v-veronica-ann-marota-mich-2021.