Daniel E. Gonzalez v. Lloyd Briseno
This text of Daniel E. Gonzalez v. Lloyd Briseno (Daniel E. Gonzalez v. Lloyd Briseno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 14, 2018
No. 04-17-00762-CV
Daniel E. GONZALEZ et al., Appellants
v.
Lloyd BRISENO, Appellee
From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017-CV-05408 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
ORDER Per order dated February 7, 2018, appellant’s brief was due March 8, 2018. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief has been filed.
Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief in this court on or before April 13, 2018. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).
We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this brief on appellant and appellee’s counsel.
_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of March, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel E. Gonzalez v. Lloyd Briseno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-e-gonzalez-v-lloyd-briseno-texapp-2018.