Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of Wyoming

2024 WY 21, 543 P.3d 242
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 2024
DocketS-23-0242
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 WY 21 (Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2024 WY 21, 543 P.3d 242 (Wyo. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2024 WY 21

October Term, A.D. 2023

February 21, 2024

DANIEL E. BORJA, SR.,

Appellant (Defendant),

v. S-23-0242

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee (Plaintiff).

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S ORDER REVOKING PROBATION [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Appellant took this appeal to challenge the district court’s August 2, 2023, Order Following Disposition of Revocation of Probation Hearing. The Court notes that order was later corrected nunc pro tunc. Appellant admitted he violated his probation. The district court revoked probation and imposed a split sentence on Appellant’s conviction for taking a controlled substance into a jail. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-5-208; Borja v. State, 2023 WY 12, 523 P.3d 1212 (Wyo. 2023).

[¶2] On December 18, 2023, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on or before February 1, 2024, Appellant may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues for the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. This Court notes that Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s order revoking probation should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Daniel E. Borja, Sr., is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Niobrara County District Court’s August 2, 2023, “Order Following Disposition of Revocation of Probation Hearing,” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 21st day of February, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M. FOX Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of Wyoming
2023 WY 12 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 WY 21, 543 P.3d 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-e-borja-sr-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2024.