Daniel Coyle, Sr. v. Aquila, Inc.

363 F. App'x 419
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2010
Docket09-1801
StatusUnpublished

This text of 363 F. App'x 419 (Daniel Coyle, Sr. v. Aquila, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Coyle, Sr. v. Aquila, Inc., 363 F. App'x 419 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Coyle appeals the order of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment to Aquila, Inc., in his employment-discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing it in the light most favorable to Coyle, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. See Didier v. Schwan Food Co., 465 F.3d 838, 841 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review). We decline to consider Coyle’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 F. App'x 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-coyle-sr-v-aquila-inc-ca8-2010.