Daniel Cervantes v. Amy Cervantes
This text of Daniel Cervantes v. Amy Cervantes (Daniel Cervantes v. Amy Cervantes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2009
DISMISSED
Appellant has filed a motion indicating that the parties have fully resolved and settled all issues in dispute. Because the parties have reached a final settlement of all issues raised in this appeal, appellant asks that we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are taxed against the appellant. See id. at (d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Cervantes v. Amy Cervantes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-cervantes-v-amy-cervantes-texapp-2009.