Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company
This text of Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company (Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 1, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
150625-6 & (76) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano DANIEL BUTTON, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee, Justices and SPECIAL TREE REHABILITATION SYSTEM, Intervening Plaintiff, v SC: 150625-6 COA: 314836, 319312 Wayne CC: 10-006165-NF PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/ Cross-Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, and QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/ Cross-Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/ Cross-Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross- appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 1, 2015 t0624 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-button-v-progressive-michigan-insurance-com-mich-2015.