Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2015·No. 150626·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 1, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

150625-6 & (76) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

DANIEL BUTTON, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee, Justices and SPECIAL TREE REHABILITATION SYSTEM, Intervening Plaintiff,

v SC: 150625-6 COA: 314836, 319312 Wayne CC: 10-006165-NF

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/ Cross-Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee,

and QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/ Cross-Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant,

and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/ Cross-Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2015

t0624 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company, (Mich. 2015).

Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company (Daniel Button v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.