Daniel Bradshaw v. Nancy Berryhill

704 F. App'x 266
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2017·No. 17-1612·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Bradshaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Bradshaw’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradshaw v. Berryhill, No. 1:16-cv-00969-LO-JFA, 2017 WL 958105 (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Bradshaw v. Nancy Berryhill, 704 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2017).

704 F. App'x 266 (Daniel Bradshaw v. Nancy Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Berryhill
E.D. Virginia, 2020