Daniel Boone v. David Chester, Attorney General of North Carolina
This text of 838 F.2d 465 (Daniel Boone v. David Chester, Attorney General of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
838 F.2d 465
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel BOONE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David CHESTER, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 87-7203.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 16, 1987.
Decided Jan. 27, 1988.
Daniel Boone, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Boone v. Chester, C/A No. 86-1044-HC (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1987). Boone's "Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority" is granted.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
838 F.2d 465, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 894, 1988 WL 6844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-boone-v-david-chester-attorney-general-of-north-carolina-ca4-1988.