Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections

Ninth Circuit

Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections

428 F.2d 824

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 1970

Docket24231

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 428 F.2d 824 (Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Boone Hymes, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director, California Department of Corrections, 428 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The decision refusing habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

The district court found that the questions presented had been previously decided and rejected by the same court. Of course, the district court can take judicial notice of its own records, and appellant has not brought forward the records of other petitions.

Also, we have trouble finding a substantial federal question in the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The decision refusing habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

The district court found that the questions presented had been previously decided and rejected by the same court. Of course, the district court can take judicial notice of its own records, and appellant has not brought forward the records of other petitions.

Also, we have trouble finding a substantial federal question in the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 F.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-boone-hymes-and-v-raymond-k-procunier-director-california-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack