Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 23, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
152253-4 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra
Bridget M. McCormack
David F. Viviano
DANIEL BERG, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Joan L. Larsen, Justices
v SC: 152253-4 COA: 321162, 321645 Newaygo CC: 12-019815-NZ
NUNZIO MUNOZ, a/k/a NORBERTO MUNOZ, and REBECCA BERG, Defendants-Appellants,
and CATHERINE BERG, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J. I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the circuit court judgments granting the defendants’ motions for summary disposition and for sanctions.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
March 23, 2016
t0316 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz (Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.