Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 23, 2016·No. 152254·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 23, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

152253-4 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

DANIEL BERG, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Joan L. Larsen, Justices

v SC: 152253-4 COA: 321162, 321645 Newaygo CC: 12-019815-NZ

NUNZIO MUNOZ, a/k/a NORBERTO MUNOZ, and REBECCA BERG, Defendants-Appellants,

and CATHERINE BERG, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the circuit court judgments granting the defendants’ motions for summary disposition and for sanctions.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 23, 2016

t0316 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz, (Mich. 2016).

Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz (Daniel Berg v. Nunzio Munoz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.