Daniel Arky, Phyllis Gimbel and Harrison Gimbel v. Eugene Arky and Babette Arky
This text of Daniel Arky, Phyllis Gimbel and Harrison Gimbel v. Eugene Arky and Babette Arky (Daniel Arky, Phyllis Gimbel and Harrison Gimbel v. Eugene Arky and Babette Arky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DANIEL GIMBEL, PHYLLIS ARKY, and HARRISON GIMBEL, Appellants,
v.
EUGENE ARKY and BABETTE ARKY, Appellees.
No. 4D2022-2816
[June 6, 2024]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CP- 001374-XXXX-SB.
Sommer C. Horton of Horton Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
James G. Pressly, Jr., of Pressly, Pressly, Randolph & Pressly, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellee Eugene Arky.
Brett C. Barner, Robb W. Armstrong, and Hunter R. Scharf of Barner & Barner, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee Babette Arky.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MAY, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Arky, Phyllis Gimbel and Harrison Gimbel v. Eugene Arky and Babette Arky, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-arky-phyllis-gimbel-and-harrison-gimbel-v-eugene-arky-and-babette-fladistctapp-2024.