Daniel Anthony Burns, Also Known as Daniel Anthony Jasek v. United States
This text of 390 F.2d 659 (Daniel Anthony Burns, Also Known as Daniel Anthony Jasek v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Convicted of interstate transportation of a stolen car under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, appellant challenges the sufficiency of proof that the car found in his possession in Arizona was the same as the one stolen in Illinois. His attack is on testimony given by a Government witness and the basis of his attack is that the witness was not sufficiently qualified as an expert.
The testimony in question was not opinion testimony but was factual, and in our judgment was clearly competent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
390 F.2d 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-anthony-burns-also-known-as-daniel-anthony-jasek-v-united-states-ca9-1968.