Daniel Anthony Burns, Also Known as Daniel Anthony Jasek v. United States

390 F.2d 659
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1968·No. 21890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Convicted of interstate transportation of a stolen car under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, appellant challenges the sufficiency of proof that the car found in his possession in Arizona was the same as the one stolen in Illinois. His attack is on testimony given by a Government witness and the basis of his attack is that the witness was not sufficiently qualified as an expert.

The testimony in question was not opinion testimony but was factual, and in our judgment was clearly competent.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Anthony Burns, Also Known as Daniel Anthony Jasek v. United States, 390 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1968).

390 F.2d 659 (Daniel Anthony Burns, Also Known as Daniel Anthony Jasek v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel A. Burns v. United States
454 F.2d 809 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)