Daniel Andrew MacGinnis v. State
This text of Daniel Andrew MacGinnis v. State (Daniel Andrew MacGinnis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-19-00313-CR NO. 09-19-00314-CR __________________
DANIEL ANDREW MACGINNIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 1A District Court Tyler County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 13,331 and 13,332 __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appointed counsel for Daniel Andrew MacGinnis, Appellant, filed a motion
to withdraw due to ineffective communication between attorney and client. It is,
therefore, ORDERED that the appeals are abated and the causes are remanded to the
trial court for a hearing to determine whether counsel can effectively represent
Appellant, and if not, to allow counsel to withdraw and appoint new counsel to
represent Appellant. A supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing on the motion
1 to withdraw, together with a supplemental clerk’s record containing and orders and
findings of the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by October 5,
2020. The appeals will be reinstated without further Order of this Court when the
supplemental records are filed. All appellate timetables are suspended while the
cases are before the trial court.
ORDER ENTERED September 3, 2020.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Andrew MacGinnis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-andrew-macginnis-v-state-texapp-2020.