Daniel Ancira v. State
This text of Daniel Ancira v. State (Daniel Ancira v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
DANIEL ANCIRA, § No. 08-11-00325-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 112th District Court THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Upton County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# 08-09-U909-SAC) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Daniel Ancira, pleaded guilty to the offense of sexual assault of a child.
Appellant now appeals the trial court’s adjudication of guilt entered after the trial court found that
Appellant had violated the conditions of his deferred-adjudication community supervision.
The conditions of Appellant’s community supervision permitted Appellant to have access
to the sexual assault victim for the purpose of visiting and checking on the progress and welfare of
his child. However, the conditions of community supervision also barred Appellant from having
any contact with the victim or any children younger than age seventeen.
After learning that Appellant had contact with the victim, including sexual contact, the
State filed a motion to adjudicate Appellant for violating the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found the violations to be true, adjudicated Appellant, sentenced him
to eight years’ confinement, and assessed a $1,500 fine.
In his sole point of error, Appellant asserts that the conditions of his deferred-adjudication
community supervision violated his due-process rights because they were so misleading and
ambiguous that a reasonable person could not discern the activity which would violate them. The
State has confessed error and joins in Appellant’s prayer that the cause be reversed and remanded.
We vacate the original submission date for this case and sustain Appellant’s sole issue.
CONCLUSION
The trial court’s judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice March 20, 2013
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Ancira v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-ancira-v-state-texapp-2013.