DANIEL ALEXIS and ROSE ALEXIS v. NEWREZ, LLC, etc.
This text of DANIEL ALEXIS and ROSE ALEXIS v. NEWREZ, LLC, etc. (DANIEL ALEXIS and ROSE ALEXIS v. NEWREZ, LLC, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 25, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-1874 Lower Tribunal No. 19-13302 ________________
Daniel Alexis and Rose Alexis, Appellants,
vs.
Newrez, LLC, etc., Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Guzman, Judge.
Pomeranz and Associates, P.A. and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellants.
Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. and Sonia Henriques McDowell (Orlando), for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150,
1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can
not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial
court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DANIEL ALEXIS and ROSE ALEXIS v. NEWREZ, LLC, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-alexis-and-rose-alexis-v-newrez-llc-etc-fladistctapp-2020.