Danie Citerme and Glaugy Citerme v. Luckenson Augustin

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 2025
Docket4D2024-2457
StatusPublished

This text of Danie Citerme and Glaugy Citerme v. Luckenson Augustin (Danie Citerme and Glaugy Citerme v. Luckenson Augustin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danie Citerme and Glaugy Citerme v. Luckenson Augustin, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIE CITERME and GLAGUY CITERME, Appellants,

v.

LUCKENSON AUGUSTIN, Appellee.

No. 4D2024-2457

[December 4, 2025]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert W. Lee, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE24036520.

Adam E. Miller of Miller Law Group, Pompano Beach, for appellants.

No Appearances for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Danie Citerme and Glaugy Citerme v. Luckenson Augustin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danie-citerme-and-glaugy-citerme-v-luckenson-augustin-fladistctapp-2025.