Danh v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
This text of 582 F. App'x 179 (Danh v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jimmy Danh and Luong Thi Ly appeal the district court’s orders granting sum[180]*180mary judgment in favor of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and awarding Fannie Mae judgment in the amount of $88,726.16, plus court costs, post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees and expenses. On appeal, Appellants assert that Fannie Mae’s claims were barred by res judicata and the Rook-er-Feldman
AFFIRMED.
D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danh-v-federal-national-mortgage-assn-ca4-2014.