D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

65 N.Y. 714
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1985·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Arnold L. Fein at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 128). See also Levine v Long Is. R. R. Co. (30 NY2d 907, affg 38 AD2d 936, 938). Additionally, we note that estoppel is not available against [716] a governmental agency engaging in the exercise of its governmental functions absent an “unusual factual situation”, which does not exist here (see, Matter of Daleview Nursing Home v Axelrod, 62 NY2d 30, 33).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, 65 N.Y. 714 (N.Y. 1985).

65 N.Y. 714 (D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levine v. LONG ISLAND RAIL RD. CO.
287 N.E.2d 272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Daleview Nursing Home v. Axelrod
464 N.E.2d 130 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Levine v. Long Island Rail Road
38 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
106 A.D.2d 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)