D'Angelo v. State

575 So. 2d 643, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 251, 1991 WL 18219
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1991·No. No. 74209·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, we accepted jurisdiction to review D’Angelo v. State, 541 So.2d 706 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), because of its conflict with Collins v. State, 535 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The issue is whether the finding that “the crime was committed in a well-organized and professional manner” is a valid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines. In the meantime, this Court has now issued its opinion in Hernandez v. State, 575 So.2d 640 (Fla.1991), which resolves this issue. Accordingly, we quash the decision below to the extent that it upheld the possibility of a departure sentence and remand the case for resentencing within the range of the sentencing guidelines.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Angelo v. State, 575 So. 2d 643, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 251, 1991 WL 18219 (Fla. 1991).

575 So. 2d 643 (D'Angelo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Delva
575 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)