Dang v. BWW Law Group (In re Dang)

Fourth Circuit

Dang v. BWW Law Group (In re Dang)

544 F. App'x 205

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2013·No. No. 13-1740·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barbara Kim Dang appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her adversary proceeding that was filed in the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dang v. BWW Law Group, No. 1:12-cv-03342-RDB, 2013 WL 1683910 (D.Md. Apr. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [206] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barbara Kim Dang appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her adversary proceeding that was filed in the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dang v. BWW Law Group, No. 1:12-cv-03342-RDB, 2013 WL 1683910 (D.Md. Apr. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [206] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dang v. BWW Law Group (In re Dang), 544 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

544 F. App'x 205 (Dang v. BWW Law Group (In re Dang)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.