Danforth v. Sargeant

14 Mass. 491
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1780
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 14 Mass. 491 (Danforth v. Sargeant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danforth v. Sargeant, 14 Mass. 491 (Mass. 1780).

Opinion

SUFFOLK,

■ This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit. Issue not guilty. The defendants had hired the premises of the plaintiff for a year, terminating the 13th of April, 1779, and held over until the 20th of May following, notwithstanding being warned out by the plaintiff; and they insisted that they had a right to retain possession until ejected by process of law.

The Court held the defence to be frivolous, and stated that the [420]*420law was clearly otherwise. The lessor, after the term is ended, may enter at pleasure and order the lessees out; and if they hold over, there is no question that it is a trespass. They accordingly directed a verdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adjmi v. Ginter Restaurant Co.
196 N.E. 842 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Sanderson v. Price
21 N.J.L. 637 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1846)
Mayo v. Fletcher
31 Mass. 525 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1833)
French v. French
3 N.H. 234 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1825)
President of the Northampton Bank v. Whiting
12 Mass. 103 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Mass. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danforth-v-sargeant-mass-1780.