Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Danford v. State

Danford v. State

992 So. 2d 319, 2008 WL 4447597
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2008
Docket5D08-937
StatusPublished

This text of 992 So. 2d 319 (Danford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danford v. State, 992 So. 2d 319, 2008 WL 4447597 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

992 So.2d 319 (2008)

Kimberly Kay DANFORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D08-937.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 29, 2008.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979).

PALMER, C.J., PLEUS and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
373 So. 2d 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
992 So. 2d 319, 2008 WL 4447597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danford-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.