Danford v. Ludovici

789 So. 2d 1068, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2001 WL 649473
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2001
DocketNos. 3D00-2341, 3D00-3021
StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 1068 (Danford v. Ludovici) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danford v. Ludovici, 789 So. 2d 1068, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2001 WL 649473 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mary Jane Danford (“Danford”) appeals from an adverse order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, her landlord, and awarding the landlord attorney’s fees and costs. Because the trial court improperly deprived Danford of her right to litigate her claims on the merits as mandated by Article I, Section 21 of the Florida Constitution, we reverse and remand for a trial on all issues except possession. See Freedman v. Geiger, 314 So.2d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Additionally, the award of attorney’s fees and costs is also reversed. See Key v. Angrand, 638 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Key v. Angrand
638 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Freedman v. Geiger
314 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 So. 2d 1068, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2001 WL 649473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danford-v-ludovici-fladistctapp-2001.