Danev v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 19 F. App'x 618 (Danev v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ventzislav I. Danev, a native and citizen of Bulgaria, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(a), 1253(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § llOSafe).1 We deny the petition for review.
Because the BIA’s decision expressly adopted the IJ’s opinion, we review the IJ’s opinion. Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). We review factual findings and the determination of an applicant’s eligibility for asylum under the substantial evidence standard. Id.
Because the incidents which led Danev to leave Bulgaria did not rise to the level of persecution, the evidence did not compel a finding of eligibility for asylum or withholding of deportation. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (asylum); Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 965 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc) (withholding); see also Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 340 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that isolated violent incident cannot alone support persecution claim).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danev-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-2001.