Danek v. Hommer

105 A.2d 677, 15 N.J. 573, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 14, 1954·Published·Cited by 135 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

Heher, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danek v. Hommer, 105 A.2d 677, 15 N.J. 573, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300 (N.J. 1954).

105 A.2d 677 (Danek v. Hommer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John William Myers v. Gny Mutual Insurance Company
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Dionicio Rodriguez v. Shelbourne Spring, LLC
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2024
Dionicio Rodriguez v. Shelbourne Spring, LLC
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2023
Memorial Properties, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance
46 A.3d 525 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Flomerfelt v. Cardiello
997 A.2d 991 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Crossman v. Yacubovich
290 S.W.3d 775 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Pruett
186 P.3d 609 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2008)
New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance v. Delta Plastics Corp.
883 A.2d 399 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
McClellan v. Feit
870 A.2d 644 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
LCS, INC. v. Lexington Ins. Co.
853 A.2d 974 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
INFORMATION SPECTRUM v. Hartford
834 A.2d 451 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Fs v. Ld
827 A.2d 335 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Botti v. CNA Ins. Co.
824 A.2d 1120 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)