Dane v. Walker
This text of 109 Mass. 179 (Dane v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a very plain case. The designation by the testator in his will of “ my brother Timothy S. Dane ” clearly described and identified the person who had been commonly called by that name, and who was the son of the testator’s mother; and is not defeated by the testator’s ignorance of his illegitimacy. By the terms of the first legacy, Timothy took a vested remainder after the death of Mrs. Arkerson in personal property, which upon his own death, leaving an estate of less than five thousand dollars in value, passed to his widow. Gen. Sts. 5. 94, § 16, cl. 6. The claim of the plaintiff and his sister, as next of kin of the testator, is therefore wholly unfounded.
Charles D. Wallace being still alive, the question who will be entitled to the other legacy after his death cannot be now decided.
[181]*181As the plaintiff in this bill asserts for his own benefit a claim which has no plausible foundation to the property as to the disposition of which he asks the instructions of the court, the decree must be that he pay Timothy S. Dane’s interest under the first legacy
To Ms widow, with eos*-s.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 Mass. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dane-v-walker-mass-1872.