Dane v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.

226 A.D. 815
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 A.D. 815 (Dane v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dane v. MacFadden Publications, Inc., 226 A.D. 815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Upon the trial of this action defendants’ proposed amendment of their answer was granted and the answer amended accordingly. Plaintiff then claimed surprise and the court permitted the withdrawal of a juror. Thereafter plaintiff moved at Special Term for an order striking out the matters contained in the answer as amended at Trial Term and to compel defendants to serve a new amended answer. The Special Term had no jurisdiction to grant this relief. Plaintiff’s remedy, if any, was to enter an order at Trial Term and to appeal therefrom to this court. (See Feizi v. Second Russian Insurance Co., 199 App. Div. 775; Copeland v. Hugo, 212 id. 229.) Moreover, plaintiff’s motion to strike out defenses, made prior to the [816]*816trial, was denied at Special Term, and from the order entered thereon plaintiff did not appeal. That decision is res adjudieata as to the matters therein determined. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conlew, Inc. v. Uhler
239 A.D. 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 A.D. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dane-v-macfadden-publications-inc-nyappdiv-1929.