Dandridge v. United States

356 U.S. 259, 78 S. Ct. 714, 2 L. Ed. 2d 757, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1267
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 7, 1958·No. 609·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to permit the defendant to change his plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dandridge v. United States, 356 U.S. 259, 78 S. Ct. 714, 2 L. Ed. 2d 757, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1267 (1958).

356 U.S. 259 (Dandridge v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Firefighters' Ret. Sys. v. EisnerAmper, L.L.P.
898 F.3d 553 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. LaVallee
422 F. Supp. 1042 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Raymond Miranda v. United States
458 F.2d 1179 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Filippo Sacco AKA John Rosselli
428 F.2d 264 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Washington
341 F.2d 277 (Third Circuit, 1965)
United States v. Lanna Washington
341 F.2d 277 (Third Circuit, 1965)
Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States
315 F.2d 667 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Sullivan v. United States
205 F. Supp. 545 (S.D. New York, 1962)
United States v. Frank Costello
275 F.2d 355 (Second Circuit, 1960)
John A. Gearhart v. United States
272 F.2d 499 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
United States v. Costello
171 F. Supp. 10 (S.D. New York, 1959)
Clarence B. Dandridge v. United States
265 F.2d 349 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)