Dancy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dancy v. State

358 So. 2d 60, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15804

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1978

DocketNo. 77-69

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 358 So. 2d 60 (Dancy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dancy v. State, 358 So. 2d 60, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15804 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been accepted by this court as a belated appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969). The point presented urges error upon the admission of testimony which indicated defendant’s involvement in a prior crime. We hold that the testimony met the test of relevancy set forth by the Supreme Court of Florida in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959). See also Dempsey v. State, 238 So.2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been accepted by this court as a belated appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969). The point presented urges error upon the admission of testimony which indicated defendant’s involvement in a prior crime. We hold that the testimony met the test of relevancy set forth by the Supreme Court of Florida in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959). See also Dempsey v. State, 238 So.2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 So. 2d 60, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dancy-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack