Dancy v. State
358 So. 2d 60, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15804
Opinion
This appeal has been accepted by this court as a belated appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969). The point presented urges error upon the admission of testimony which indicated defendant’s involvement in a prior crime. We hold that the testimony met the test of relevancy set forth by the Supreme Court of Florida in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959). See also Dempsey v. State, 238 So.2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dancy v. State, 358 So. 2d 60, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15804 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
358 So. 2d 60 (Dancy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Francois v. Harris
366 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)