Dancy v. . Smith
This text of 68 N.C. 179 (Dancy v. . Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only point raised by the pleadings is decided in Johnston v. Neville at this t&rm. Here his Honor directed one Whitmore to be made a party defendant upon *180 the suggestion that he had while administrator pendente lite induced the defendant W. H. Spiith to bid at the sale of the effects of his intestate, promising the said Smith that the amount of his bids should go as a payment on á large debt due from his intestate to the said Smith..
This alleged agreement has never been executed; on the contrary the plaintiff now seeks to recover the amount of the defendants’ bid.
Plis Honor it appears deemed it equitable that Whitmore should be made a party; but whether the defendant Smith will be benefited thereby or otherwise it is not for us to •consider.
There is no error.
This will be certified.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.C. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dancy-v-smith-nc-1873.