Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd.

256 A.D.2d 62, 681 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13117

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered June 5, 1998, which denied the motion of nonparty appellant to intervene in this action and to vacate an order dated July 30, 1997, which sealed the record, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion to intervene and to remand for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The motion to intervene is granted only to the extent of remanding this matter to the trial court for an expedited de novo determination, upon written submissions, and the issuance of a written decision which shall detail the grounds underlying any finding of “good cause” in accordance with the provisions of Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 216.1. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias, and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered June 5, 1998, which denied the motion of nonparty appellant to intervene in this action and to vacate an order dated July 30, 1997, which sealed the record, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion to intervene and to remand for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The motion to intervene is granted only to the extent of remanding this matter to the trial court for an expedited de novo determination, upon written submissions, and the issuance of a written decision which shall detail the grounds underlying any finding of “good cause” in accordance with the provisions of Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 216.1. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias, and Saxe, JJ.

Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd., 256 A.D.2d 62, 681 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

256 A.D.2d 62 (Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related