Dance v. Middleton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Dance v. Middleton

76 So. 2d 598, 1954 La. App. LEXIS 968

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 1, 1954

DocketNo. 8210

StatusPublished

This text of 76 So. 2d 598 (Dance v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dance v. Middleton, 76 So. 2d 598, 1954 La. App. LEXIS 968 (La. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

•HARDY, Judge.

This is a, companion suit to the case of Carter v. Middleton, No. 8209, La.App., 76 So.2d 594. The cases were consolidated for trial and the facts involved are identical.

• The plaintiff in this case, Frank M. Dance, was the owner of the property which was leased to Carter and brought this [599]*599suit to recover the value of the Barn, a structure some 40 by 30 feet, allegedly valued at $1,500, together with an additional sum of $260 alleged to have been the value of 1,000 feet of lumber, a loading rack and a pecan tree, which were also destroyed in the fire. There was judgment in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,460, from which the defendants have appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the 'case of Carter v. Middleton, No. 8209, La.App., 76 So.2d 594, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

AYRES, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

•HARDY, Judge.

This is a, companion suit to the case of Carter v. Middleton, No. 8209, La.App., 76 So.2d 594. The cases were consolidated for trial and the facts involved are identical.

• The plaintiff in this case, Frank M. Dance, was the owner of the property which was leased to Carter and brought this [599]*599suit to recover the value of the Barn, a structure some 40 by 30 feet, allegedly valued at $1,500, together with an additional sum of $260 alleged to have been the value of 1,000 feet of lumber, a loading rack and a pecan tree, which were also destroyed in the fire. There was judgment in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,460, from which the defendants have appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the 'case of Carter v. Middleton, No. 8209, La.App., 76 So.2d 594, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

AYRES, J., recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 So. 2d 598, 1954 La. App. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dance-v-middleton-lactapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack