Dance v. Garner
This text of 475 S.E.2d 646 (Dance v. Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Donald Dance appeals the denial of the filing of his Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Because mandamus is not available to compel a public official to perform a discretionary act unless there is a gross abuse of discretion, we affirm.
Dance is currently incarcerated and brought this mandamus action against J. Wayne Garner, the former Chairman of the Board of Pardons and Paroles, to require Garner to set a tentative release date in accordance with the Parole Decision Guidelines. In adopting these guidelines, the Pardons and Paroles Board reserved the discretion to deviate from the guidelines and to establish a tentative parole month at any time prior to the expiration of a prisoner’s sentence.1 Because the board retained the discretion to set Dance’s parole date beyond the guidelines’ recommendation, and because mandamus is not available to control a public official’s discretion,2 the trial court did not err in denying its filing.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 S.E.2d 646, 267 Ga. 126, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3293, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dance-v-garner-ga-1996.