Danam Vs. Kelley

477 P.3d 364

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAFAEL CEZAR DANAM, No. 82036 Petitioner, vs. ELAINE KELLEY, IN HER OFFICIAL FILE CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL ALIANTE SOMERSET CHARTER, DEC 1 1 2020 ELIZABETH A BROM

Res • ondent. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By

oEpirn, CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se "Petition for Extraordinary Writ for U.S. Constitution Violation from U.S. District Court of Nevada." Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy available to him either by way of filing a civil complaint in the Eighth Judicial District Court, or an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to the extent he seeks to challenge the dismissal of his federal complaint. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we ORDER the petiAn DEN!ED.1 , C.J.

Pickering

Hardesty Silver

'Petitioner's December 4, 2020, motion for surnmary judgment is denied.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I907A 441110, cc: Rafael Cezar Danarn Law Office of Gary P. Sinkeldam APC

SUPREME COURT OF

NEVADA 2 ( 0) 19471s 4.41EP.