Danaher v. Hitchcock
34 Mich. 516, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 212
This text of 34 Mich. 516 (Danaher v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Danaher v. Hitchcock, 34 Mich. 516, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 212 (Mich. 1876).
Opinion
There is nothing in the exceptions relied upon. That, which relates to the want of an averment of defendants’ partnership is covered by Pegg v. Bidleman, 5 Mich., 26, and that which relates to the venue is settled by the statute.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lewis v. Joseph Hartley & Sons Co.
83 N.E.2d 438 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1949)
Marx Bros. v. Culpepper & Dupont
40 Fla. 322 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1898)
Towle v. Dunham
42 N.W. 1117 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Mich. 516, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danaher-v-hitchcock-mich-1876.