Danaher v. Garlock

Michigan Supreme Court

Danaher v. Garlock

33 Mich. 295, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 37

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 18, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 33 Mich. 295 (Danaher v. Garlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Danaher v. Garlock, 33 Mich. 295, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 37 (Mich. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We think there is no material distinction between this case and Wells v. Martin, 32 Mich., 478, as to the proof introduced to show liability.

. We discover no evidence in the record tending to show an original undertaking by Danaher, or any act of ratification of any arrangement which Fahy & Dye may have made, and the bill of exceptions states that the substance of all the testimony given is set out; and the judge, after refer[296]*296ring in his charge to the evidence supposed to bear on the point, stated that it was substantially the testimony produced by both parties.

The judgment should be set aside, with costs, and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

We think there is no material distinction between this case and Wells v. Martin, 32 Mich., 478, as to the proof introduced to show liability.

. We discover no evidence in the record tending to show an original undertaking by Danaher, or any act of ratification of any arrangement which Fahy & Dye may have made, and the bill of exceptions states that the substance of all the testimony given is set out; and the judge, after refer[296]*296ring in his charge to the evidence supposed to bear on the point, stated that it was substantially the testimony produced by both parties.

The judgment should be set aside, with costs, and a new trial ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Mich. 295, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danaher-v-garlock-mich-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack